sex • law • policy • feminism • porn • privacy • kink • speech • constitution
Tuesday, February 6, 2007
If marriage is for procreation...
...then let's really define in terms of procreation! That's the straightforward logic of a new ballot initiative recently filed in Washington. No need for constitutional analysis here; while it may be getting difficult to tell the difference, this one is definitely a satire. The real anti-marriage campaigners are not amused. Neither are equality advocates in the state, who understandably don't view last summer's anti-marriage supreme court ruling as a laughing matter. I wonder whether anyone will vote for it?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment