Tuesday, February 6, 2007

If marriage is for procreation...

...then let's really define in terms of procreation! That's the straightforward logic of a new ballot initiative recently filed in Washington. No need for constitutional analysis here; while it may be getting difficult to tell the difference, this one is definitely a satire. The real anti-marriage campaigners are not amused. Neither are equality advocates in the state, who understandably don't view last summer's anti-marriage supreme court ruling as a laughing matter. I wonder whether anyone will vote for it?

No comments: